- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Sorry to hear about your refusal if you are going for appeal hire a good lawyer.......as your visa been refused thats why your baby visa get refused thats what his comment means. your baby should have right of appeal by the way how many appeal forms you got?jzwho wrote:My application was refused due to 2 reasons:
1. I submitted 2 contracts to prove my business activities, the comments said: "the only evidence that you have submitted to demonstrate that you are active in that occupation as part of your business does not seem up to the level 4 or above framework. " I think the caseworker isn't sure about that either. I have a PhD, one contract shows I am teaching a university student, the other contract shows I am teaching school students. Does the second contract not satisfy the requirement? But I have the first contract to show I am qualified. Confused.
2. I give the maintenance proof as my bank statement trace back 3 months with enough funds. The comments said: "Not satisfied that you have provided the specified documents to show you have been in possession of sufficient funds for the specified period." But which part is wrong? Confused.
Anyway both me and my wife have the chance to appeal, but when it come to my 2 years old baby who's born here, no appeal is allowed! The comments said: "not satisfied that you are a child of a parent who has valid leave to enter or remain or who is, at the same time, being granted leave to remain as a tier 1 migrant." Isn't that crazy? We have right to appeal while baby cannot, has to go back immediately?
Could someone give some advises please? Thanks.
Thank you for reply. I have received three appeal forms.i_am_sultan wrote:Sorry to hear about your refusal if you are going for appeal hire a good lawyer.......as your visa been refused thats why your baby visa get refused thats what his comment means. your baby should have right of appeal by the way how many appeal forms you got?jzwho wrote:My application was refused due to 2 reasons:
1. I submitted 2 contracts to prove my business activities, the comments said: "the only evidence that you have submitted to demonstrate that you are active in that occupation as part of your business does not seem up to the level 4 or above framework. " I think the caseworker isn't sure about that either. I have a PhD, one contract shows I am teaching a university student, the other contract shows I am teaching school students. Does the second contract not satisfy the requirement? But I have the first contract to show I am qualified. Confused.
2. I give the maintenance proof as my bank statement trace back 3 months with enough funds. The comments said: "Not satisfied that you have provided the specified documents to show you have been in possession of sufficient funds for the specified period." But which part is wrong? Confused.
Anyway both me and my wife have the chance to appeal, but when it come to my 2 years old baby who's born here, no appeal is allowed! The comments said: "not satisfied that you are a child of a parent who has valid leave to enter or remain or who is, at the same time, being granted leave to remain as a tier 1 migrant." Isn't that crazy? We have right to appeal while baby cannot, has to go back immediately?
Could someone give some advises please? Thanks.
i dont understand ... have you done your phD in the uK? if thats the case, then the rules for phd are more flexible and easy. phD itself falls in the research category which is level 6.jzwho wrote:My application was refused due to 2 reasons:
1. I submitted 2 contracts to prove my business activities, the comments said: "the only evidence that you have submitted to demonstrate that you are active in that occupation as part of your business does not seem up to the level 4 or above framework. " I think the caseworker isn't sure about that either. I have a PhD, one contract shows I am teaching a university student, the other contract shows I am teaching school students. Does the second contract not satisfy the requirement? But I have the first contract to show I am qualified. Confused.
2. I give the maintenance proof as my bank statement trace back 3 months with enough funds. The comments said: "Not satisfied that you have provided the specified documents to show you have been in possession of sufficient funds for the specified period." But which part is wrong? Confused.
Anyway both me and my wife have the chance to appeal, but when it come to my 2 years old baby who's born here, no appeal is allowed! The comments said: "not satisfied that you are a child of a parent who has valid leave to enter or remain or who is, at the same time, being granted leave to remain as a tier 1 migrant." Isn't that crazy? We have right to appeal while baby cannot, has to go back immediately?
Could someone give some advises please? Thanks.
Shinya wrote:i dont understand ... have you done your phD in the uK? if thats the case, then the rules for phd are more flexible and easy. phD itself falls in the research category which is level 6.jzwho wrote:My application was refused due to 2 reasons:
1. I submitted 2 contracts to prove my business activities, the comments said: "the only evidence that you have submitted to demonstrate that you are active in that occupation as part of your business does not seem up to the level 4 or above framework. " I think the caseworker isn't sure about that either. I have a PhD, one contract shows I am teaching a university student, the other contract shows I am teaching school students. Does the second contract not satisfy the requirement? But I have the first contract to show I am qualified. Confused.
2. I give the maintenance proof as my bank statement trace back 3 months with enough funds. The comments said: "Not satisfied that you have provided the specified documents to show you have been in possession of sufficient funds for the specified period." But which part is wrong? Confused.
Anyway both me and my wife have the chance to appeal, but when it come to my 2 years old baby who's born here, no appeal is allowed! The comments said: "not satisfied that you are a child of a parent who has valid leave to enter or remain or who is, at the same time, being granted leave to remain as a tier 1 migrant." Isn't that crazy? We have right to appeal while baby cannot, has to go back immediately?
Could someone give some advises please? Thanks.
maintaining the funds for 90 days means the funds should not fall below £900 at any time. have you withdrawn any part of it in between ?
tsl wrote:teaching uni student and school doesnt fall in to category of required service level im afraid
If you are PhD, then you can only specify certain occupations with right titles... did you not check the SOC list ?jzwho wrote:Shinya wrote:i dont understand ... have you done your phD in the uK? if thats the case, then the rules for phd are more flexible and easy. phD itself falls in the research category which is level 6.jzwho wrote:My application was refused due to 2 reasons:
1. I submitted 2 contracts to prove my business activities, the comments said: "the only evidence that you have submitted to demonstrate that you are active in that occupation as part of your business does not seem up to the level 4 or above framework. " I think the caseworker isn't sure about that either. I have a PhD, one contract shows I am teaching a university student, the other contract shows I am teaching school students. Does the second contract not satisfy the requirement? But I have the first contract to show I am qualified. Confused.
2. I give the maintenance proof as my bank statement trace back 3 months with enough funds. The comments said: "Not satisfied that you have provided the specified documents to show you have been in possession of sufficient funds for the specified period." But which part is wrong? Confused.
Anyway both me and my wife have the chance to appeal, but when it come to my 2 years old baby who's born here, no appeal is allowed! The comments said: "not satisfied that you are a child of a parent who has valid leave to enter or remain or who is, at the same time, being granted leave to remain as a tier 1 migrant." Isn't that crazy? We have right to appeal while baby cannot, has to go back immediately?
Could someone give some advises please? Thanks.
maintaining the funds for 90 days means the funds should not fall below £900 at any time. have you withdrawn any part of it in between ?
Yes, I got my PhD in the UK. I haven't touched the money for more than 90 days, but the statement only covers 3 months period.
jzwho wrote:I have post them my resume , cover letter and business plan ,so confused about caseworker's comments ,and I don't know what exactly went wrong.