- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
You should get 3 years on your extension, so you should be fine if you extend in 2014.dandm wrote:Very worrying. We entered nine months after the start of our visa (August 2011). We did our first extension last year and it runs until Nov 2015. Need a second extension to cover the gap to ILR.
I was always worried they would do this.
That was what I was wondering. We just need to get to August 2016, but I thought second extensions were 2 rather than 3 years? So far we've had 2 years (initial) + 3 years (first extension).sts96508 wrote:You should get 3 years on your extension, so you should be fine if you extend in 2014.dandm wrote:Very worrying. We entered nine months after the start of our visa (August 2011). We did our first extension last year and it runs until Nov 2015. Need a second extension to cover the gap to ILR.
I was always worried they would do this.
That's contrary to what our immigration solicitor just told us, unfortunately.sts96508 wrote:dandm,
Extensions after April-2010 are for three years.
http://immigrationboards.com/viewtopic.php?t=143477
Some case workers have misinterpreted Section 245CB discussed in the above thread to grant 2 years extension, but they are in the minority.
Anybody granted 2 years' extension should contact UK BA for correction.
It should no longer be confusing topic, as params0073 already highlighted that everyone now is eligible for 3 years extension.dandm wrote:Hmm. Our advisor's view was that in his experience second extensions are always 2 years. But there are clearly people on this forum who have got 3 year second extensions, so it's confusing.
Whatever, this appears to be a concerning development.
Well we have just called the UKBA and they say that they alternate for extensions. So if you got 2 + 3 then you would get + 2 and + 3 for your next two extensions. For us this means that our extension would be 2 years and we would fall short of ILR.abhisheks9 wrote:It should no longer be confusing topic, as params0073 already highlighted that everyone now is eligible for 3 years extension.dandm wrote:Hmm. Our advisor's view was that in his experience second extensions are always 2 years. But there are clearly people on this forum who have got 3 year second extensions, so it's confusing.
Whatever, this appears to be a concerning development.
i have also posted reasoning behind 3 yrs extension in following thread
http://www.immigrationboards.com/viewto ... 178#906178
Unless you have a massive military to back you up, I don't know how you can force a nation to have foreign people stay in it against its will. The United Kingdom is a sovereign nation. Outside of losing that sovereignty, can they really be compelled to leave a visa category open even if they don't want to?dandm wrote:He advises HSMP style litigation if this does turn out to be the case.
It's not a matter of expecting them to keep it open indefinitely, just to give some leeway to those who received some of the last batch of visas (ours was granted in Nov 2010) that did not travel instantly. In our case we wanted work lined up in advance, and that took some time. We are only talking about a second extension here, something many Tier 1 holders have enjoyed.ouflak1 wrote:Unless you have a massive military to back you up, I don't know how you can force a nation to have foreign people stay in it against its will. The United Kingdom is a sovereign nation. Outside of losing that sovereignty, can they really be compelled to leave a visa category open even if they don't want to?dandm wrote:He advises HSMP style litigation if this does turn out to be the case.
That's perfectly reasonable. But I guess what I'm saying is, what if the UK government says April 6th, 2014 and not one day longer? You and others present your reasonable argument and they still says April 6th, 2014 and not one day longer. So you go the litigation route. My question then is what argument can you present that would convince a UK judge that his own nation can't decide what foreigners can stay in and on what conditions those foreigners can stay in, however that nation sees fit? I could see the UKBA having some special transitional allowances for certain circumstances, but I can't see anyway to force the UK to do anything, short of winning a war against them. I just don't see how litigation will be plausible.dandm wrote:It's not a matter of expecting them to keep it open indefinitely, just to give some leeway to those who received some of the last batch of visas (ours was granted in Nov 2010) that did not travel instantly. In our case we wanted work lined up in advance, and that took some time. We are only talking about a second extension here, something many Tier 1 holders have enjoyed.ouflak1 wrote:Unless you have a massive military to back you up, I don't know how you can force a nation to have foreign people stay in it against its will. The United Kingdom is a sovereign nation. Outside of losing that sovereignty, can they really be compelled to leave a visa category open even if they don't want to?dandm wrote:He advises HSMP style litigation if this does turn out to be the case.
he should be fine even if he extends in August 2014 for 2 years, actually ))sts96508 wrote:You should get 3 years on your extension, so you should be fine if you extend in 2014.dandm wrote:Very worrying. We entered nine months after the start of our visa (August 2011). We did our first extension last year and it runs until Nov 2015. Need a second extension to cover the gap to ILR.
I was always worried they would do this.
wait, where does it say April 6th?ouflak1 wrote:That's perfectly reasonable. But I guess what I'm saying is, what if the UK government says April 6th, 2014 and not one day longer? You and others present your reasonable argument and they still says April 6th, 2014 and not one day longer. So you go the litigation route. My question then is what argument can you present that would convince a UK judge that his own nation can't decide what foreigners can stay in and on what conditions those foreigners can stay in, however that nation sees fit? I could see the UKBA having some special transitional allowances for certain circumstances, but I can't see anyway to force the UK to do anything, short of winning a war against them. I just don't see how litigation will be plausible.dandm wrote:It's not a matter of expecting them to keep it open indefinitely, just to give some leeway to those who received some of the last batch of visas (ours was granted in Nov 2010) that did not travel instantly. In our case we wanted work lined up in advance, and that took some time. We are only talking about a second extension here, something many Tier 1 holders have enjoyed.ouflak1 wrote:Unless you have a massive military to back you up, I don't know how you can force a nation to have foreign people stay in it against its will. The United Kingdom is a sovereign nation. Outside of losing that sovereignty, can they really be compelled to leave a visa category open even if they don't want to?dandm wrote:He advises HSMP style litigation if this does turn out to be the case.
That depends on when exactly in 2014 they are stopping extensions. April would be most consistent with past practice and links back to the route being closed in Aprl 2011.sagareva wrote:he should be fine even if he extends in August 2014 for 2 years, actually ))sts96508 wrote:You should get 3 years on your extension, so you should be fine if you extend in 2014.dandm wrote:Very worrying. We entered nine months after the start of our visa (August 2011). We did our first extension last year and it runs until Nov 2015. Need a second extension to cover the gap to ILR.
I was always worried they would do this.