- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
I'm not an expert on Indian nationality law and this is better to be discussed in the other countries section of the forum but I believe your child is no longer Indian and can't keep his Indian passport. The fact that he managed to travel using both passports doesn't make it legal. The UK authorities don't care about his other nationalities. They won't ask questions if he present a British passport. The India authorities don't know he is British. Whatever you were told while exiting India was wrong as far as I know. Basically your child is subject to a fine for every travel he has been doing 3 months after granted British citizenship.Gols wrote:Okay! After lot of search and my personal experience I know that a minor can hold both the passports (uk &indian) till 18.
My child was born in uk (parents Indian passport) got his Indian PP in 2010. Travelled to India in 2010 on Indian PP without any Problem.
Jambo wrote:I'm not an expert on Indian nationality law and this is better to be discussed in the other countries section of the forum but I believe you child is no longer Indian and can't keep his Indian passport. The fact that he managed to travel using both passport doesn't make it legal. The UK authorities don't care about his other nationalities. The India authorities don't know he is British. Whatever you were told while exiting India was wrong as far as I know. Basically you child is subject to a fine for every travel he has been doing 3 months after granted British citizenship.Gols wrote:Okay! After lot of search and my personal experience I know that a minor can hold both the passports (uk &indian) till 18.
My child was born in uk (parents Indian passport) got his Indian PP in 2010. Travelled to India in 2010 on Indian PP without any Problem.
Jambo wrote:So he has one valid (British) passport and one cancelled (Indian) passport. I'm not familiar with Indian formalities but I would assume he was allowed to exit India because he had a valid passport (the British one). I don't know why he wasn't asked for an exit visa.
He can't use his Indian passport for travel or to enter India anymore as it is cancelled. You need a valid passport to travel or to enter a country. I don't think he would manage to enter India using a cancelled passport.
Ayyubi72 wrote:I might be wrong, but I am pretty sure that if one of the parent acquires foreign citizenship, then child also loses their citizenship.
Even if I am wrong, I think you will be taking a big risk. A personal experience may not be of much help to you, as another immigration officer might take a different view and cause your trouble.
In my opinion, the best course of action will be, to surrender child's Indian passport, and obtain Indian visa on British passport. Once you are back, you can apply for child's OCI. If the child is going to be in India for a while, then you can apply for OCI from India too.
Obtaining child's visa will cost you a few bobs more, but believe me its not worth taking risk when it comes to dealing with Indian officials. Treat the visa fee as insurance against any problems you might face when leaving India.
InUkOnHsmp wrote:Why would you do that mate, why would you put your kids in that kind of jeopardy?
The way I see it there are only 2 real options:
1) Take British passport for them, surrender Indian passport, get OCI.
2) Do not take British passport, retail Indian passport and go for RoA.
Out of the 2, I would still prefer 1 for my kids, as you never know who you may find at immigration and what you may have to face if your travel document is not a passport or a valid visa on a passport.
Since you have gone for option 3, where you keep both passports, and travel on each as required, can you explain what advantages you are getting out of this?
I am sure that my son is allowed to keep both the PP till 18, so I carry PP's always withme. Immigration officer also told that it is a new rule so not many people know this.
My 2 cents.
Do you have any official link/email about this? Thats exactly my point, its a new rule (if it is!), so you might face issues.I am sure that my son is allowed to keep both the PP till 18, so I carry PP's always withme. Immigration officer also told that it is a new rule so not many people know this.
RegardsSince you have gone for option 3, where you keep both passports, and travel on each as required, can you explain what advantages you are getting out of this?
Regards[/quote]Since you have gone for option 3, where you keep both passports, and travel on each as required, can you explain what advantages you are getting out of this?
In your initial post you stated that you did a lot of research but you keep correcting yourself. You might have not done enough research so I agree with the other suggestions that you should seek legal advice.Gols wrote:Jambo wrote:So he has one valid (British) passport and one cancelled (Indian) passport. I'm not familiar with Indian formalities but I would assume he was allowed to exit India because he had a valid passport (the British one). I don't know why he wasn't asked for an exit visa.
He can't use his Indian passport for travel or to enter India anymore as it is cancelled. You need a valid passport to travel or to enter a country. I don't think he would manage to enter India using a cancelled passport.[/
SORRY my fault .
Here is the correct information.
son never got cancelled stamp on Indian PP.
Also in Delhi, they put immigration stamp on his UK PP and not on his Indian PP.
Now JUMBO, according to you he was allowed to exit India because he had a valid passport (the British one). I don't know why he wasn't asked for an exit visa.
I don't think one can leave Indian without exit permit or valid visa etc. earlier They were asking about his exit permit but later on after discussing with the FRRO they allowed him, and told that he can keep both PP till18.
I m sure that minor can hold both the passport till 18. This topic is also discussed here
http://www.immigrationboards.com/viewto ... sc&start=0
And the FRRO himself told to keep both the passports but my question is can he also travel on the Indian PP???
Again my Apologies for the misunderstanding
Regards.
ban.s wrote:Probably this is the first time someone confirmed at this forum that a child was allowed to leave without an exit visa and along with Indian passport.
The key question here is - for a child, British by birth but Indian by descent under section 4, whether obtaining a BP passport is considered as "voluntary" acquisition of foreign nationality?
I concur with Jambo's interpretation. As the child obtained British Passport hence foreign citizenship right has been excercised and thus the child lost Indian citizenship. However there were cases in India around "voluntary" acquisition of overseas citizenship for a minor and I am not fully familiar with the decision on those cases. I would suggest discuss with someone competent in Indian nationality law especially in these areas.
Thanks wpilr_nov12,wpilr_nov12 wrote:My advice: do not take chances with immigration matters. You could miss your flight or refused by the carrier. And airfare on short notice for three from India to London does not come cheap.
Thanks jumbo,Jumbo wrote:In your initial post you stated that you did a lot of research but you keep correcting yourself. You might have not done enough research so I agree with the other suggestions that you should seek legal advice.
If the Indian passport was still valid/legal when exiting, then why was a stamp placed in his UK passport?