http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC ... 0_iac.html
According to determination....
Guys I think only little hope is left on SC.
Upper tribunal case on 08 Oct 2013, the upper tribunal judge clearly mention beginning of the representation that they are bind to follow CoA on Raju and khatel case.
"
(1) It is not legally possible for the First-tier Tribunal or the Upper Tribunal to decline to follow the judgment in Raju and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 754 on the basis that the Secretary of State’s Tier 1 (Post-Study Work) policy of July 2010 (concerning the approach to be taken to “late” submission of certain educational awards) continued to apply in respect of decisions taken by the Secretary of State on or after 6 April 2012, when the Immigration Rules were changed by abolishing the Tier 1 PSW route."
Judge Peter lane clearly given his decision on paragraph 112
"112. Applying our findings in Parts I, K and L above to the individual facts as set out in Part M above, we hereby find that, with the exception of Mr Gambo (appellant (14)), they have all failed to show that the variation decisions against which they appealed were not in accordance with the law, including the Immigration Rules, for any of the reasons advanced by them and recorded in those Parts. They have also failed to show why, in the light of this, rule 45 should not be invoked so as to set aside the determinations of the Upper Tribunal, against which the respondent sought permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal. We do so. In the case of Mr Nasim (appellant (1)), the determination of the First-tier Tribunal allowing his appeal contains an error of law and we have decided to set the determination aside."
Judge also allowed the appeal under 47 removal decision and that means your appeal has been partially allowed.
"We re-make the decisions in the appeals against the respondent’s immigration decisions by, in each case, allowing the appellants’ appeals against the section 47 removal decisions and by dismissing the appeals against the variation decisions."
Also those appeal was under article 8 will be another hearing on human right ground. it is not been decided yet.
So guys don't loose hope. wait for SC permission.
