- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
well its salaried income by both partners. and one partner is having short term fall in the income.seagul wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 5:39 amIf you are on fixed wages (salaried person) then be extra cautious because HO will take the lowest wages figure during the latest six months. But if you are on variable income (non-salaried person) then if you got sick/unpaid holidays then you can do overtime in next month/months to fill the shortfall.
hmm well i got it. morally that's how it is supposed to be throughout the period however if it does not then law does not really bite you for not maintain the threshold.Obie wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 1:02 pmWell the rule work on the presumption that the person will be working at that rate for he duration of the visa.
However if one look at the system for savings, you see that the resources is meant to cover for the duration of the person's visa and not simply for a period of 6 months.
But as contributors have correctly pointed out, for people in Employment , what counts is the position in the 6 months leading to the application for further leave or indefinite leave.
You don't need to maintain the required threshold all the times but its in case of category A but how about if your circumstances changes then you have to rely on category B then you will have to demonstrates the sufficient income from the last at least 12 months. Therefore, its always wise that if you earn less in on month then try to do extra work in another month or if your partner is also working then in either case (category A/B) more likely be no issue.wahi66 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 1:43 pmhmm well i got it. morally that's how it is supposed to be throughout the period however if it does not then law does not really bite you for not maintain the threshold.Obie wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 1:02 pmWell the rule work on the presumption that the person will be working at that rate for he duration of the visa.
However if one look at the system for savings, you see that the resources is meant to cover for the duration of the person's visa and not simply for a period of 6 months.
But as contributors have correctly pointed out, for people in Employment , what counts is the position in the 6 months leading to the application for further leave or indefinite leave.