[iD] wrote:Thanks for your reply, I really appreciate it.
I am the sole owner of the company and the only director (in theory I am the company).
So if for example I can not show my company's funds as mine then does it also mean that I can not show company's earnings as mine? because I don't give myself any salary or dividend, I just earn and spend from the same account (I sell stuff on ebay).
No you are not the Company- A company is another individual entity!!
Please read the guidance carefully - Acceptable evidences as described under para 199 -201 clearly state that these need to be in your name. So if the account is the name of the Company you cant meet the criteria.
Coming back to your question as to why a differentiation has been made between treatment of earnings from 100% owned Company - In my opinion, the earnings are all yours after the Company has paid all taxes etc. - as a majority shareholder you can pass a resolution to distribute the earnings to yourself as you have clearly made those (net) earnings by being the sole owner.
Concept of maintenance funds has to do with availability of liquid funds to maintain oneself in UK. Funds held in a company do not belong entirely to the shareholders - for example if there is a security over its assets/borrowings then the lenders have first rights over the same. Similarly other mandatory expenses like taxes, insurance, fines etc. are senior to the rights of the shareholders. It makes it difficult to determine if the funds held in Company's account do really (& if so in their entirety) belong to the sole shareholder.
Hope that clarifies